Veuillez trouver ci-dessous un appel à contributions d'une de nos membres associés Karine Gagné (U. Guelph) et Georgina Drew (U. Adelaide) pour la conférence de l'International Society for the Study of Religion, Nature, and Culture (ISSRNC) qui se tiendra en février 2021 en Arizona: https://www.issrnc.org/2020/03/02/2021-issrnc-conference-cfp/
Cet appel à contributions est intitulé “Vital Ice: Perceiving Past, Present, and Future in Melting Ice-scapes” (voir la présentation détaillée ci-dessous) et pourrait intéresser les chercheurs dont les études potent sur les religions et/ ou les sciences.
Les propositions doivent être envoyées avant le 3 août 2020.
Vital Ice: Perceiving Past, Present, and Future in Melting Ice-scapes
Are glaciers and ice bodies good barometers of change? Are they perhaps more than physical matter as sentient beings or mirrors of humanity? What does the materiality and being-ness of glaciers and ice bodies tell us about the past, present and future, in their plurality, of humans and nonhumans? In healthy ice, we see life. In melting ice, we see death and loss. What does the process of glacial melt tell us of the dangers and the horrors of our present moment? For in the retreating of ice, we foresee myriad domino effects as river flows lessen, freshwater stocks diminish, and agricultural lifeways are jeopardized.
With this panel, we propose to think of ice bodies as a vital entity, or assemblages of interdependent relations. Glaciers and other ice bodies are sometimes considered as a nonhuman force, physical and symbolic ‘vibrant matter’ (as per Jane Bennett), or a web of relations whose emerging agency acts on humans. The vitality of ice bodies is also seen in their personhood, and with their recession, persons or entities vanish, along with their stories, histories, and knowledge. Ice masses can also be parts of assemblages that bring together different forms of life – human, nonhuman, and divine –, which are linked by principles of reciprocity. Vitality is also a central element in how ice is known. These diverse perspectives and relationships with ice often meet in their view of ice loss as holding up a mirror to the cascading loss of other vibrancies. Thus, from the co-evolution of indigenous people and glaciers to the recession of sacred glaciers, glacial lives and lifeways are also in peril.
Ice masses are not just data and numbers. The vitality of ice is also an important component of the relationship that scientists and local populations are forming with ice bodies. Glaciers, frozen lakes and rivers, and icefields are part of icescapes that are known through embodied experiences, sensory engagements and lead to the development of an intimate knowledge about the environment. Ice has here a vibrancy that contributes to our understanding of past, present and future lives.
Can an expanded understanding of ice bodies’ vitality help us better comprehend the interconnected risks of their demise? How might their affective storylines be mobilized to illuminate past, present and future trajectories as having been nourished and still being nourished, at least in part, by ice? In order to shed some light on these questions, we welcome contributions that examine humans’ relationship with glaciers and other ice bodies which are emerging from different forms of engagements and are anchored into sensorial experiences, material experimentation, relational ontologies, or principles of reciprocity.
Please contact Karine Gagné with a brief abstract if you are interested in joining our panel.